linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/panic/kexec: fix "crash_kexec_post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:32:59 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Hatayama, Daisuke/畑山 大輔 
	<d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/panic/kexec: fix "crash_kexec_post_notifiers"
 option issue in oops path

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:27:10AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > 
> >> >   f06e5153f4ae ("kernel/panic.c: add "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" option for kdump after panic_notifers")
> >> > 
> >> > Was that crash_kexec() was called unconditionally after notifiers were 
> >> > called, which should be fixed via the simple patch below (untested). 
> >> > Looks much simpler than your fix.
> >> 
> >> No, Daisuke's patch is not for that case. [...]
> >
> > Yet the actual bug is in that commit, 'crash_kexec_post_notifiers' was 
> > clearly not a no-op in the default case, against expectations.
> >
> > So the first step should be to restore the original behavior (my 
> > patch), then should any new tweaks be added.
> 
> Honestly I think the proper fix is to simply revert f06e5153f4ae.
> 
> It was clearly not properly tested by the people who wanted it because
> they came back quite a while later with additional bleh.
> 
> I think this pretty much counts as hitting the code doesn't work let's
> remove it threshold.

IMHO, we should give users flexibility of running panic notifiers before
crash_kexec(). Different people have been asking for it since last 7-8
years and it is a pretty small code in kernel so no major maintenance
headache. 

Agreed that this might be very unreliable, but if users want to shoot
themseleves in the foot, it is their choice. This will not be upstream
default and I am hoping that distributions don't make it their default
either.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/