lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGnW=Bbkum2NEDy7sMkpd6T+e5ksNBf2L8wmpiCWkED9ugkxrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:04:55 +0530
From:	punnaiah choudary kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>
To:	"Jeff Lauruhn (jlauruhn)" <jlauruhn@...ron.com>
Cc:	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>,
	"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shaktib@...inx.com" <shaktib@...inx.com>,
	"michals@...inx.com" <michals@...inx.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Expand the ecc placement locations to 1260

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Jeff Lauruhn (jlauruhn)
<jlauruhn@...ron.com> wrote:
> This device has a Page size x8: 17,600 bytes (16,384 + 1216 bytes) and minimum required ECC 24-bit ECC per 1100 bytes of data.  Spare area needed for ECC would be ECC * M, where M is (codeword <= 2^m-1).  In this case M=14, because (1100*8)<=2^14-1, therefore minimum spare area needed is 14*24 = 336b or 42B per codeword.  So for this device a minimum of 672bytes of the 1216 need to be used for ECC, the rest can be used for other purposes.
>

Ok. Does it mean increasing the size to 672 bytes will be enough ?
I see that 672 bytes is the minimum required size for 24 bit ecc. There
may be controllers that may detect errors beyond 24 bit and would require
more number of  ecc bytes per codeword. So, i configured the ecc position
value to max oobsize and i believe this change is needed.

Regards,
Punnaiah
>
>
> Jeff Lauruhn
> NAND Application Engineer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mtd [mailto:linux-mtd-bounces@...ts.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:50 AM
> To: dwmw2@...radead.org; computersforpeace@...il.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; shaktib@...inx.com; michals@...inx.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; kalluripunnaiahchoudary@...il.com; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> Subject: [PATCH] mtd: Expand the ecc placement locations to 1260
>
> Device like MT29F32G08ABCDBJ4 have a writesize/oobsize of 16K/1260 Bytes.
> So, increasing the maximum ecc placement locations to 1260
>
> Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h index f17fa75..e73d85b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct mtd_oob_ops {
>  };
>
>  #define MTD_MAX_OOBFREE_ENTRIES_LARGE  32
> -#define MTD_MAX_ECCPOS_ENTRIES_LARGE   640
> +#define MTD_MAX_ECCPOS_ENTRIES_LARGE   1260
>  /*
>   * Internal ECC layout control structure. For historical reasons, there is a
>   * similar, smaller struct nand_ecclayout_user (in mtd-abi.h) that is retained
> --
> 1.7.4
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ