linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] x86, mce, severities: Add AMD severities function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55117C89.6080609@amd.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:02:33 -0500
From:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<tony.luck@...el.com>, <slaoub@...il.com>, <luto@...capital.net>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] x86, mce, severities: Add AMD severities function

On 3/24/2015 3:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:42:52AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>>   
>> +/* keeping mce_severity_amd in sync with AMD error scope heirarchy table */
> Which table do you mean?
>
> I changed it to:
>
> /*
>   * See AMD Error Scope Hierarchy table in a newer BKDG. For example
>   * 49125_15h_Models_30h-3Fh_BKDG.pdf, section "RAS Features"
>   */

Yes, this is the one I meant.
Thanks.

> to explicitly name it.
>
>> +static int mce_severity_amd(struct mce *m, enum context ctx)
>> +{
>> +	enum context ctx = error_context(m);
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c: In function ‘mce_severity_amd’:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c:192:15: error: ‘ctx’ redeclared as different kind of symbol
>    enum context ctx = error_context(m);
>                 ^
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c:190:57: note: previous definition of ‘ctx’ was here
>   static int mce_severity_amd(struct mce *m, enum context ctx)
>                                                           ^
> make[4]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.o] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> I fixed it up.

Sorry about that.
That line should be in [patch 2/2] and I mistakenly committed it as part 
of this patch.

It didn't show up on my builds as I had build tested after applying both 
patches.

But there is a different problem now.
The second patch won't apply cleanly on top of your fix-

error: while searching for:
}

/* keeping mce_severity_amd in sync with AMD error scope heirarchy table */
static int mce_severity_amd(struct mce *m, enum context ctx)
{
         enum context ctx = error_context(m);
         /* Processor Context Corrupt, no need to fumble too much, die! */

error: patch failed: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c:187

I think the clean way to fix this would be to move the line to [patch 2/2].
Besides, we would need a new patch 2 anyway as the patch application 
would fail due to changes to the comment line.

Shall I do that and resend?

Thanks,
-Aravind.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/