[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324110428.486d3293@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:04:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guilherme Cox <cox@...puter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools lib traceevent: Pulling in updates from
trace-cmd
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:57:27 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:57:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > Arnaldo,
> >
> > I took a look at the differences between what I have in trace-cmd and
> > what is sitting in tools/lib/traceevent, and I put together a patch set
> > that brings in fixes and updates to libtraceevent.
>
> Thanks, will process now.
I just added this one too...
-- Steve
>From fe80b2e9396fa6b8dc66a6dfd4c7a426e1685424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guilherme Cox <cox@...puter.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:10:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: Zero should not be considered "not
found" in eval_flag()
Guilherme Cox found that:
There is, however, a potential bug if there is an item with code zero
that is not the first one in the symbol list, since eval_flag(..)
returns 0 when it doesn't find anything.
Reported-by: Guilherme Cox <cox@...puter.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index aff743710001..f2fb50141703 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -3576,7 +3576,7 @@ static const struct flag flags[] = {
{ "HRTIMER_RESTART", 1 },
};
-static unsigned long long eval_flag(const char *flag)
+static long long eval_flag(const char *flag)
{
int i;
@@ -3592,7 +3592,7 @@ static unsigned long long eval_flag(const char *flag)
if (strcmp(flags[i].name, flag) == 0)
return flags[i].value;
- return 0;
+ return -1LL;
}
static void print_str_to_seq(struct trace_seq *s, const char *format,
@@ -3666,7 +3666,7 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size,
struct print_flag_sym *flag;
struct format_field *field;
struct printk_map *printk;
- unsigned long long val, fval;
+ long long val, fval;
unsigned long addr;
char *str;
unsigned char *hex;
@@ -3725,11 +3725,11 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size,
print = 0;
for (flag = arg->flags.flags; flag; flag = flag->next) {
fval = eval_flag(flag->value);
- if (!val && !fval) {
+ if (!val && fval < 0) {
print_str_to_seq(s, format, len_arg, flag->str);
break;
}
- if (fval && (val & fval) == fval) {
+ if (fval > 0 && (val & fval) == fval) {
if (print && arg->flags.delim)
trace_seq_puts(s, arg->flags.delim);
print_str_to_seq(s, format, len_arg, flag->str);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists