[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXNQh668oAAzFGe6V4Yyu0GeM=3jBVR6Tc6mPPdUQ3VGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:00:49 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>, vincent.weaver@...ne.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Another go at ktime_get_raw_fast_ns()
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> > So yeah, I just didn't try hard enough it seems; how about this?
>>
>> Yea, this looks much better! I'll queue it up for testing and if that
>> goes well include it for 4.1.
>
> I have a few patches that depend on it, so if you're ok with it I'd like
> to carry the lot. But yes please test ;-)
Sure thing. It collides with some minor changes Ingo requested from
me, but I'll rework my stuff ontop of yours (so if you can push this
set to tip/timers/core, I'd appreciate it).
I'll let you know when the tests finish.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists