[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324171925.GL23705@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:19:25 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Add ramp time for HI_PWR
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:05:54AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:40:50PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:06:09AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > So changes to move to the top voltage always take constant time while
> > > all other voltage changes are instantaneous? That doesn't seem right.
> > > I'd expect something more like a calculation based on some number of
> > > miliseconds per milivolt.
>
> > Its more just that this is the only case that we really care
> > about. The reg only ever gets used at 1.2V and 1.8V, and the
> > only case where there is a problem is if we ask for 1.8V and
> > we don't have it yet.
>
> > I don't think we really have the data to give for other cases. I
> > could expand the comment perhaps? Or TBH it is fast enough it is
> > unlikely to ever be a problem in practice so we could just drop
> > the patch.
>
> You'll probably find that the ramp is pretty much linear so just
> changing to something that multiplies out to the expected value will be
> good enough. I'd rather not have bad examples that other drivers might
> copy.
Cool, I will respin.
Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists