linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 33/48] sched: Energy-aware wake-up task placement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150324174720.GK18994@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:47:20 +0000
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
	"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
	"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 33/48] sched: Energy-aware wake-up task placement

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:53:52PM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:42:42PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > Right, I agree that we should preferably do the normal thing for U ~= 1.
> > We can restructure the wake-up path to follow that pattern, but we need
> > to know U beforehand to choose the right path. U isn't just
> > get_cpu_usage(prev_cpu) but some broader view of the of the cpu
> > utilizations. For example, prev_cpu might be full, but everyone else is
> > idle so we still want to try to do an energy aware wake-up on some other
> > cpu. U could be the minium utilization of all cpus in prev_cpu's
> > sd_llc, which is somewhat similar to what energy_aware_wake_cpu() does.
> 
> Yeah, or a setting in the root domain set by the regular periodic load
> balancer; that already grew some mojo to determine this in a patch I
> recently commented on.

Yes, I was thinking something like that too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/