[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324180156.GA14658@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:01:56 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Adjust the return value of _REV on x86
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:22:18PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> At that time rt286 I2S wasn't even in the kernel. Bard didn't start
> to land it until later that year
> (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/07cf7cbadb4d97a78be61119a406de8fe446467e).
> Was it really that crazy to plan Linux to take HDA mode?
Since we don't expose any way for the platform to detect that it's
running Linux, yes.
> I would like to respectfully ask that this patch not be added to older
> stable kernel versions. It will knowingly cause a regression with
> hardware in the field. If this isn't an appropriate criteria for
> avoiding to backport a patch to stable, what is?
Will it? You haven't shipped the firmware that changes this behaviour
yet.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists