lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150325091147.GA1565@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:11:47 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:12:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Record currently wakes up based on watermarks to read events 
> > > from the mmaps and write them out to the file. The result is a 
> > > file that can have large blocks of events per mmap before a 
> > > finished round event is added to the stream.  This in turn 
> > > affects the quantity of events that have to be passed through 
> > > the ordered events queue before results can be displayed to the 
> > > user. For commands like perf-script this can lead to long 
> > > unnecessarily long delays before a user gets output. Large 
> > > systems (e.g, 1024 cpus) further compound this effect. I have 
> > > seen instances where I have to wait 45 minutes for perf-script 
> > > to process a 5GB file before any events are shown.
> > > 
> > > This patch adds an option to perf-record to allow a user to 
> > > specify the poll timeout in msec. For example using 100 msec 
> > > timeouts similar to perf-top means the mmaps are traversed much 
> > > more frequently leading to a smoother analysis side.
> > 
> > Please tune the default value (perhaps influenced by N_PROC?) so 
> > that users will get sane behavior without having to specify this 
> > option!
> 
> Isn't this a followup patch? [...]

Will a followup patch be written?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ