[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1427275897.31588.2.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:31:37 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@...escale.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@...escale.com>,
paulus@...ba.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmoore@...hat.com,
strosake@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] powerpc: Enable seccomp filter support
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 13:44 +0200, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
> On 27.02.2015 22:54, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 09:28 +0200, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
> >> Ping?
> >
> > What is the ping for ?
> >
> > Ben.
>
> Hello Ben,
>
> I just wanted to check with you what's the current status of these
> patches. I noticed in patchwork [1][2][3] that the patches are marked as
> non-applicable.
>
> As of today, I cloned Michael Ellerman's tree [4], applied the patches
> on the master branch, compiled and tested. Tests pass both with the
> libseccomp regression suite and my LXC tests.
>
> Is there a specific tree I should send them against, or on another
> mailing list? Is there any other reason the patches are not applicable?
I just haven't had time to review them properly.
Because you're touching the syscall path for all powerpc platforms it needs
more scrutiny than the average patch.
It should still make 4.1, probably :)
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists