[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5512B73C.5050509@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:25:16 +0100
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/mm: Tracking vDSO remap
On 25/03/2015 13:11, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Some processes (CRIU) are moving the vDSO area using the mremap system
>> call. As a consequence the kernel reference to the vDSO base address is
>> no more valid and the signal return frame built once the vDSO has been
>> moved is not pointing to the new sigreturn address.
>>
>> This patch handles vDSO remapping and unmapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>> index 73382eba02dc..be5dca3f7826 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> #include <asm/mmu.h>
>> #include <asm/cputable.h>
>> -#include <asm-generic/mm_hooks.h>
>> #include <asm/cputhreads.h>
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -109,5 +108,40 @@ static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void arch_dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *oldmm,
>> + struct mm_struct *mm)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void arch_exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> + if (start <= mm->context.vdso_base && mm->context.vdso_base < end)
>> + mm->context.vdso_base = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
>> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
>> + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * mremap don't allow moving multiple vma so we can limit the check
>> + * to old_start == vdso_base.
>
> s/mremap don't allow moving multiple vma
> mremap() doesn't allow moving multiple vmas
>
> right?
Sure you're right.
I'll provide a v3 fixing that comment.
Thanks,
Laurent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists