[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5512BE9F.8070305@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:56:47 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM64: kernel: acpi: honour acpi=force command line
parameter
On 2015/3/25 1:58, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> If acpi=force is passed on the command line, it forces ACPI to be
> the only available boot method, hence it must be left enabled even
> if the initialization and sanity checks on ACPI tables fails.
>
> This patch refactors ACPI initialization to prevent disabling ACPI
> if acpi=force is passed on the command line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> ---
Although it will introduce some useless table parsing for some
bad ACPI tables, it still obey the policy for acpi=force, and it makes
param_acpi_force much self-contained, so
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 6 ++++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index e1a8965..59c05d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ typedef u64 phys_cpuid_t;
> extern int acpi_disabled;
> extern int acpi_noirq;
> extern int acpi_pci_disabled;
> -extern bool param_acpi_force;
>
> /* 1 to indicate PSCI 0.2+ is implemented */
> static inline bool acpi_psci_present(void)
> @@ -92,8 +91,6 @@ void __init acpi_init_cpus(void);
> static inline bool acpi_psci_present(void) { return false; }
> static inline bool acpi_psci_use_hvc(void) { return false; }
> static inline void acpi_init_cpus(void) { }
> -
> -#define param_acpi_force false
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> #endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 542f045..789994a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int enabled_cpus;
> static bool bootcpu_valid __initdata;
>
> static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
> -bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
> +static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
>
> static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
> {
> @@ -324,8 +324,10 @@ out:
> * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed,
> * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI
> * on initialization error.
> + * If acpi=force was passed on the command line it forces ACPI
> + * to be enabled even if its initialization failed.
> */
> - if (err)
> + if (err && !param_acpi_force)
> disable_acpi();
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index d60b1ad..b278311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> early_ioremap_reset();
>
> - if (acpi_disabled && !param_acpi_force) {
> + if (acpi_disabled) {
> unflatten_device_tree();
> psci_dt_init();
> cpu_read_bootcpu_ops();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists