[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5512C903.6070905@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:41:07 -0600
From: David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified
On 3/25/15 6:14 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> If David doesn't come up with something I'll probably will, as making
> 'trace' use the ordered_samples, like 'perf top' does (initially with
> some arbitrary reasonable poll timeout value), is a low hanging fruit to
> get those multi-CPU tracepoints sorted until I get something better in
> place...
I have thought about it. It needs to be an adaptive algorithm:
1. start at 100 msec.
2. Read the maps. How much data are there (not events, but data size)?
3. Adjust poll timeout up or down with some heuristic -- maybe something
similar to the algorithm perf-top uses for removing entries from the
histograms.
That said, I still thinking giving the user control is not a crazy idea.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists