[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1503251707350.27044@AMDC1262.digital.local>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:07:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@...sung.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Skalski <l.skalski@...sung.com>,
Paul Osmialowski <p.osmialowsk@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kdbus: move all kdbus headers to include/linux/kdbus
Hi,
First of all, I'm sorry for this no-subject covering letter. Accidents
never happen only in a perfect world.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, David Herrmann wrote:
>
> I'd prefer if we only move the required structure definitions into a
> separate header. There is no reason to export all internal entry
> points.
>
You're right, this would definitely look nicer.
>
> Anyway, this is a technicality that actually depends on the
> implemented LSM hooks. So I'd prefer if we discuss that in combination
> with the actual LSM patches. I'm not entirely sure which parts are
> needed. For testing-purposes, we can always use -I./ipc/kdbus/, right?
>
Yes we can, which makes whole this patch a bit premature.
However, we can't predict whether someone may want to use kdbus headers
for any other purpose. As for now, I don't see immediate need for this
apart from implementing LSM callbacks.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists