[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5512E8FF.8030305@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:57:35 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: Fix ppid for synthesized fork events
On 3/25/15 6:22 AM, Joe Mario wrote:
> We ran "time perf mem record -a -e cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/pp -e
> cpu/mem-stores/pp sleep 10" on a system that was running SPECjbb2013 in
> the background. There were about 10,000 java threads with about 500 to
> 800 in a runnable state at any given time. We ran it on a 4 socket x86
> IVB server.
>
> We had two perf binaries. One with your patch and one without it.
> Because the benchmark doesn't always have a constant load, we ran the
> above perf command in a loop alternating between the patched and
> unpatched version. The elapsed wall clock times ("real" field from
> time) for the perf with your patch was typically >= 50% longer than the
> equivalent unpatched perf.
Sent a v2 with performance numbers on my end.
Adding -BN to the record removes processing of the events for build-ids.
I also chose to use -e cpu-clock -F 1000 with -- usleep 1 to trim what
perf-record is doing to *only* reading /proc files and generating COMM
and FORK events.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists