linux-kernel - Re: [Linux-nvdimm] another pmem variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gUsKcZSjmFdNP=2B-Vosnu8ppQfkEH2Q4eCfaabxwGKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:18:03 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] another pmem variant

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:00:26AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The kernel command line would simply be the standard/existing memmap=
>> to reserve a memory range.  Then, when the platform device loads, it
>> does a request_firmware() to inject a binary table that further carves
>> memory into ranges to which the pmem driver attaches.  No need for the
>> legacy system BIOS to be upgraded to the "new way".
>
> Ewww...
>
>> It does do the right thing in kernel space.  The userspace utility
>> creates the binary table (once) that can be compiled into the platform
>> device driver or auto-loaded by an initrd.  The problem with a new
>> memmap= is that it is too coarse.  For example you can't do things
>> like specify a pmem range per-NUMA node.
>
> Sure you can as long as you know the layout.  memmap= can be specified
> multiple times.   Again, I see absolutely zero benefit of doing crap
> like request_firmware() to convert interface, and I'm also tired of
> having this talk about code that will eventually be released and should
> be superior (and from all that I can guess so far will actually be far
> worse).

You and me both...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/