[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55130220.7020700@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:44:48 +0000
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 45/48] sched: Skip cpu as lb src which has one task
and capacity gte the dst cpu
On 24/03/15 15:27, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:31:22PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
>>
>> Skip cpu as a potential src (costliest) in case it has only one task
>> running and its original capacity is greater than or equal to the
>> original capacity of the dst cpu.
>
> Again, that's what, but is lacking a why.
>
You're right, the 'why' is completely missing.
This is one of our heterogeneous (big.LITTLE) cpu related patches. We
don't want to end up migrating this single task from a big to a little
cpu, hence the use of capacity_orig_of(cpu). Our cpu topology makes sure
that this rule is only active on DIE sd level.
We could replace the use of capacity_orig_of(cpu) w/ capacity_of(cpu) to
take big.LITTLE and RT and/or IRQ work into consideration which then
would effect the MC sd level too.
Will add the 'why' in the next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists