linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/mm: Tracking vDSO remap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:09:57 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
	criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/mm: Tracking vDSO remap

On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > +static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +			struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +			unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +	if (start <= mm->context.vdso_base && mm->context.vdso_base < end)
> > +		mm->context.vdso_base = 0;
> > +}
> 
> So AFAICS PowerPC can have multi-page vDSOs, right?
> 
> So what happens if I munmap() the middle or end of the vDSO? The above 
> condition only seems to cover unmaps that affect the first page. I 
> think 'affects any page' ought to be the right condition? (But I know 
> nothing about PowerPC so I might be wrong.)

You are right, we have at least two pages.
> 
> > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
> > +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +			      unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> > +			      unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * mremap() doesn't allow moving multiple vmas so we can limit the
> > +	 * check to old_start == vdso_base.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (old_start == mm->context.vdso_base)
> > +		mm->context.vdso_base = new_start;
> > +}
> 
> mremap() doesn't allow moving multiple vmas, but it allows the 
> movement of multi-page vmas and it also allows partial mremap()s, 
> where it will split up a vma.
> 
> In particular, what happens if an mremap() is done with 
> old_start == vdso_base, but a shorter end than the end of the vDSO? 
> (i.e. a partial mremap() with fewer pages than the vDSO size)

Is there a way to forbid splitting ? Does x86 deal with that case at all
or it doesn't have to for some other reason ?

Cheers,
Ben.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/