[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE_wzQ_8YzZwizyozU-0MPLX8-hT1Y1LnfYFg+iEvQgYX7zjFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:17:17 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] phy: phy-core: allow specifying supply at port level
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 21 March 2015 02:55 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
>> Multi-port phy's may have per-port power supplies. Let's change phy core
>> to first attempt to look up the supply at the port level, and then, if
>> not found, check parent device.
>
> Why not just have every port provide the power supply if it needs?
> I don't think checking for parent device should be present in the phy-core at
> all.
We need to do that if we want to keep compatibility with the current
DTSes: before this patch the supply would be always looked up on
device and not port level.
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists