linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: Add SMP support for the Allwinner A23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:39:08 -0700
From:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:	"maxime.ripard" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	"kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com" <kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com>,
	"linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com" <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: Add SMP support for the
 Allwinner A23

Hi Maxime,

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:18 AM, maxime.ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:05:06PM +0800, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com wrote:
>> >> One question I couldn't find any answer to is that does the SMP bit is
>> >> set in secondary_startup?
>> >>
>> >> I couldn't find where it was set, but it still looks like the right
>> >> thing to do, so I would expect the code to do that.
>> >
>> > I don't see it either. The sun8i code is just the sun6i code with the
>> > power clamps removed. And sun6i secondary_startup was removed some time
>> > ago in commit 1146b600044d ("ARM: sunxi: fix build for THUMB2_KERNEL").
>> >
>> > ChenYu
>>
>> The SMP bit should be set in the function of "__v7_ca7mp_setup", which is located
>> in the file:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S?id=refs/tags/v4.0-rc4
>> I'm not sure if this is your discussion.
>
> It is, but I wasn't seeing it called anywhere in the secondary_startup
> code path.
>
> I was expecting a direct call, but it looks like it's a dynamic call,
> with a function-pointer like call, that is indeed run both in the
> kernel entry point and the secondary_startup.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/kernel/head.S?id=refs/tags/v4.0-rc4#n389

Are we waiting for Marc's input on this?

ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/