| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150326043005.GB20016@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:30:05 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: performance changes on 4400755e: 200.0% fsmark.files_per_sec,
-18.1% fsmark.files_per_sec, and few more
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:03:59PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:00:30 +0800 Yuanahn Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed performance changes on `fsmark.files_per_sec' by 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f57b1c7546c3765:
> >
> > > commit 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f57b1c7546c3765
> > > Author: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 26 12:47:56 2015 +1100
> > > Commit: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > > CommitDate: Wed Mar 4 13:40:19 2015 +1100
> > >
> > > md/raid5: allow the stripe_cache to grow and shrink.
>
> Thanks a lot for this testing!!! I was wondering how I could do some proper
> testing of this patch, and you've done it for me :-)
Welcome!
>
> The large number of improvements is very encouraging - that is what I was
> hoping for of course.
>
> The few regressions could be a concern. I note that are all NoSync.
> That seems to suggest that they could just be writing more data.
It's not a time based test, but size based test:
> > 40G, 30G, 120G: means the total test size
Hence, I doubt it might be writing more data.
> i.e. the data is written a bit earlier (certainly possible) so it happen to
> introduce more delay ....
>
> I guess I'm not really sure how to interpret NoSync results, and suspect that
> poor NoSync result don't really reflect much on the underlying block device.
> Could that be right?
Sorry, I'm not quite sure I followed you. Poor NoSync result? Do you
mean the small number like 63.133, 57.600? They are of unit of
files_per_sec, and file size is 4M. Hence, it would be 200+ MB/s, which
is not that bad in this case, as it's a 3 hard disk RAID5.
> > 3 8.1 63.133 ±0.5% 3 9.2 55.633 ±0.2% -11.9% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-120G-NoSync
Here are few iostat sample from 26089f4902595a2f64c512066af07af6e82eb096
of above test:
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 0.63 1.67 0.00 97.70
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 30353.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 121860.00 1015.50 1.29 5.35 0.00 5.35 3.50 83.90
sdc 0.00 30353.00 0.00 241.00 0.00 122372.00 1015.54 0.66 2.74 0.00 2.74 2.53 60.90
sda 0.00 30353.00 0.00 242.00 0.00 122884.00 1015.57 1.29 5.36 0.00 5.36 3.52 85.20
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 956.00 0.00 244736.00 512.00 227231.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 100.00
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.02 0.00 0.69 1.69 0.00 97.60
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 30988.00 0.00 247.00 0.00 125444.00 1015.74 1.77 7.17 0.00 7.17 4.02 99.40
sdc 0.00 30988.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 124420.00 1015.67 1.19 4.82 0.00 4.82 3.67 89.90
sda 0.00 30988.00 0.00 247.00 0.00 125444.00 1015.74 0.65 2.65 0.00 2.65 2.54 62.70
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 976.00 0.00 249856.00 512.00 228206.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 100.00
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 0.61 1.67 0.00 97.72
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 0.00 29718.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 119300.00 1015.32 1.35 5.71 0.00 5.71 3.71 87.20
sdc 0.00 29718.00 0.00 236.00 0.00 119812.00 1015.36 1.19 5.06 0.00 5.06 3.43 80.90
sda 0.00 29718.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 119300.00 1015.32 0.87 3.69 0.00 3.69 2.99 70.20
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 936.00 0.00 239616.00 512.00 229157.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 100.00
And few iostat sample of 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f57b1c7546c3765(first bad commit):
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.02 0.00 1.09 1.54 0.00 97.35
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 1.00 27677.00 1.00 206.00 8.00 100516.00 971.25 27.40 130.56 196.00 130.24 4.72 97.70
sdc 0.00 27677.00 0.00 207.00 0.00 101028.00 976.12 27.05 129.43 0.00 129.43 4.61 95.50
sda 5.00 27677.00 1.00 211.00 16.00 102984.00 971.70 26.61 127.00 201.00 126.64 4.50 95.50
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 824.00 0.00 210944.00 512.00 224122.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.21 100.00
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.00 0.00 0.98 1.54 0.00 97.47
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 3.00 21203.00 1.00 218.00 16.00 107060.00 977.86 30.44 147.77 198.00 147.54 4.53 99.10
sdc 2.00 21203.00 2.00 220.00 16.00 108592.00 978.45 31.12 150.65 208.00 150.13 4.43 98.40
sda 0.00 21203.00 1.00 220.00 24.00 108020.00 977.77 30.56 150.88 197.00 150.67 4.38 96.80
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 720.00 0.00 184320.00 512.00 224963.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 100.00
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
0.02 0.00 0.96 1.63 0.00 97.39
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdb 11.00 29455.00 3.00 213.00 56.00 102958.00 953.83 31.19 134.97 205.00 133.99 4.56 98.40
sdc 0.00 29454.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 99890.00 951.33 29.36 127.07 0.00 127.07 4.36 91.60
sda 1.00 29454.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 103534.00 963.11 27.54 117.54 0.00 117.54 4.26 91.60
md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 876.00 0.00 224256.00 512.00 225993.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 100.10
> > 3 0.5 273.100 ±4.3% 3 0.6 223.567 ±6.5% -18.1% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-4BRD_12G-RAID5-btrfs-4M-30G-NoSync
> > 3 8.1 63.133 ±0.5% 3 9.2 55.633 ±0.2% -11.9% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 3 8.2 64.000 ±0.0% 3 9.2 57.600 ±0.0% -10.0% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-120G-NoSync
>
> Also, I'm a little confused by the
> fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
> statistic:
>
> > 1235 ± 2% -47.5% 649 ± 3% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
>
> > 399 ± 4% -20.0% 319 ± 3% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
>
> Does that means that the ext4 test changed from 12.4 cpus to 6.4, and that
> the btrfs test chnages from 4 cpus to 3.2 ???
fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got is output from /usr/bin/time, which
is from gnu time package. There is the explanation from source code:
* P == percent of CPU this job got (total cpu time / elapsed time)
--yliu
>
> Or does it just not mean anything?
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
>
>
> >
> > 26089f4902595a2f64c512066af07af6e82eb096 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f57b1c7546c3765
> > ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
> > run time(m) metric_value ±stddev run time(m) metric_value ±stddev change testbox/benchmark/sub-testcase
> > --- ------ ---------------------------- --- ------ ---------------------------- -------- ------------------------------
> > 3 18.6 6.400 ±0.0% 5 9.2 19.200 ±0.0% 200.0% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > 3 24.7 6.400 ±0.0% 3 13.7 12.800 ±0.0% 100.0% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-f2fs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > 3 17.5 28.267 ±9.6% 3 12.3 42.833 ±6.5% 51.5% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-f2fs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 3 16.7 30.700 ±1.5% 3 12.6 40.733 ±2.4% 32.7% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-f2fs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 3 29.0 5.867 ±0.8% 5 23.6 7.240 ±0.7% 23.4% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > 3 28.5 6.000 ±0.0% 3 23.2 7.367 ±0.6% 22.8% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-f2fs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > 5 11.7 14.600 ±0.0% 5 9.7 17.500 ±0.4% 19.9% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-xfs-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > 3 22.4 25.600 ±0.0% 5 17.9 30.120 ±4.1% 17.7% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-xfs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 5 10.8 47.320 ±0.6% 5 9.3 54.820 ±0.2% 15.8% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-xfs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 1 0.5 252.400 ±0.0% 1 0.5 263.300 ±0.0% 4.3% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-4BRD_12G-RAID5-ext4-4M-30G-NoSync
> >
> > 3 0.5 273.100 ±4.3% 3 0.6 223.567 ±6.5% -18.1% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-4BRD_12G-RAID5-btrfs-4M-30G-NoSync
> > 3 8.1 63.133 ±0.5% 3 9.2 55.633 ±0.2% -11.9% ivb44/fsmark/1x-1t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-120G-NoSync
> > 3 8.2 64.000 ±0.0% 3 9.2 57.600 ±0.0% -10.0% ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-btrfs-4M-120G-NoSync
> >
> >
> > NOTE: here are some more info about those test parameters for you to
> > understand the testcase better:
> >
> > 1x: where 'x' means iterations or loop, corresponding to the 'L' option of fsmark
> > 1t, 64t: where 't' means thread
> > 4M: means the single file size, corresponding to the '-s' option of fsmark
> > 40G, 30G, 120G: means the total test size
> >
> > 4BRD_12G: BRD is the ramdisk, where '4' means 4 ramdisk, and where '12G' means
> > the size of one ramdisk. So, it would be 48G in total. And we made a
> > raid on those ramdisk.
> >
> >
> > As you can see from above data, interestingly, all performance
> > regressions come from btrfs testing. That's why Chris is also
> > in the cc list, with which just FYI.
> >
> >
> > FYI, here I listed more detailed changes for the maximal postive and negtive changes.
> >
> > more detailed changes about ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-3HDD-RAID5-ext4-4M-40G-fsyncBeforeClose
> > ---------
> >
> > 26089f4902595a2f 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f
> > ---------------- --------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 6.40 ± 0% +200.0% 19.20 ± 0% fsmark.files_per_sec
> > 1.015e+08 ± 1% -73.6% 26767355 ± 3% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 13793 ± 1% -73.9% 3603 ± 5% fsmark.time.system_time
> > 78473 ± 6% -64.3% 28016 ± 7% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
> > 15789555 ± 9% -54.7% 7159485 ± 13% fsmark.app_overhead
> > 1115 ± 0% -50.3% 554 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
> > 1115 ± 0% -50.3% 554 ± 1% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
> > 1235 ± 2% -47.5% 649 ± 3% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> > 456465 ± 1% -26.7% 334594 ± 4% fsmark.time.minor_page_faults
> > 275 ± 0% +1257.7% 3733 ± 2% slabinfo.raid5-md0.num_objs
> > 275 ± 0% +1257.7% 3733 ± 2% slabinfo.raid5-md0.active_objs
> > 11 ± 0% +1250.9% 148 ± 2% slabinfo.raid5-md0.active_slabs
> > 11 ± 0% +1250.9% 148 ± 2% slabinfo.raid5-md0.num_slabs
> > 2407 ± 4% +293.4% 9471 ± 26% numa-meminfo.node0.Writeback
> > 600 ± 4% +294.9% 2372 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_writeback
> > 1114505 ± 0% -77.4% 251696 ± 2% softirqs.TASKLET
> > 1808027 ± 1% -77.7% 402378 ± 4% softirqs.RCU
> > 12158665 ± 1% -77.1% 2786069 ± 4% cpuidle.C3-IVT.usage
> > 1119433 ± 0% -77.3% 254192 ± 2% softirqs.BLOCK
> > 37824202 ± 1% -75.1% 9405078 ± 4% cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage
> > 1.015e+08 ± 1% -73.6% 26767355 ± 3% time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 13793 ± 1% -73.9% 3603 ± 5% time.system_time
> > 5971084 ± 1% -73.6% 1574912 ± 5% softirqs.SCHED
> > 10539492 ± 3% -72.0% 2956258 ± 6% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.usage
> > 2 ± 0% +230.0% 6 ± 12% vmstat.procs.b
> > 14064 ± 1% -71.2% 4049 ± 6% softirqs.HRTIMER
> > 7388306 ± 1% -71.2% 2129929 ± 4% softirqs.TIMER
> > 3.496e+09 ± 1% -70.3% 1.04e+09 ± 1% cpuidle.C3-IVT.time
> > 0.88 ± 6% +224.9% 2.87 ± 11% turbostat.Pkg%pc6
> > 19969464 ± 2% -66.2% 6750675 ± 5% cpuidle.C1-IVT.usage
> > 78473 ± 6% -64.3% 28016 ± 7% time.involuntary_context_switches
> > 4.23 ± 5% +181.4% 11.90 ± 3% turbostat.Pkg%pc2
> > 2.551e+09 ± 1% -61.4% 9.837e+08 ± 3% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time
> > 8084 ± 3% +142.6% 19608 ± 3% meminfo.Writeback
> > 2026 ± 4% +141.6% 4895 ± 4% proc-vmstat.nr_writeback
> > 165 ± 4% -56.9% 71 ± 14% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_anon
> > 7.748e+09 ± 3% -50.3% 3.852e+09 ± 3% cpuidle.C1-IVT.time
> > 175 ± 5% -53.2% 82 ± 13% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
> > 1115 ± 0% -50.3% 554 ± 1% time.elapsed_time.max
> > 1115 ± 0% -50.3% 554 ± 1% time.elapsed_time
> > 1147 ± 0% -49.0% 585 ± 1% uptime.boot
> > 2260889 ± 0% -48.8% 1157272 ± 1% proc-vmstat.pgfree
> > 16805 ± 2% -35.9% 10776 ± 23% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirty
> > 1235 ± 2% -47.5% 649 ± 3% time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> > 67245 ± 2% -35.9% 43122 ± 23% numa-meminfo.node1.Dirty
> > 39041 ± 0% -45.7% 21212 ± 2% uptime.idle
> > 13 ± 9% -49.0% 6 ± 11% vmstat.procs.r
> > 3072 ± 10% -40.3% 1833 ± 9% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> > 3045115 ± 0% -46.1% 1642053 ± 1% proc-vmstat.pgfault
> > 202 ± 1% -45.2% 110 ± 0% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
> > 4583079 ± 2% -31.4% 3143602 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit
> > 28.03 ± 0% +69.1% 47.39 ± 1% turbostat.CPU%c6
> > 223 ± 1% -41.1% 131 ± 1% proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
> > 4518820 ± 3% -30.8% 3128304 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local
> > 3363496 ± 3% -27.4% 2441619 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirtied
> > 3345346 ± 3% -27.4% 2428396 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_written
> > 0.18 ± 18% +105.6% 0.37 ± 36% turbostat.Pkg%pc3
> > 3427913 ± 3% -27.3% 2492563 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_file
> > 13712431 ± 3% -27.3% 9971152 ± 20% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive
> > 13711768 ± 3% -27.3% 9970866 ± 20% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive(file)
> > 3444598 ± 3% -27.2% 2508920 ± 20% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_file_pages
> > 13778510 ± 3% -27.2% 10036287 ± 20% numa-meminfo.node1.FilePages
> > 8819175 ± 1% -28.3% 6320188 ± 19% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
> > 8819051 ± 1% -28.3% 6320152 ± 19% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
> > 14350918 ± 3% -26.8% 10504070 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
> > 100892 ± 3% -26.0% 74623 ± 19% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_slab_reclaimable
> > 403571 ± 3% -26.0% 298513 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node1.SReclaimable
> > 3525 ± 13% +36.6% 4817 ± 14% slabinfo.blkdev_requests.active_objs
> > 3552 ± 13% +36.3% 4841 ± 14% slabinfo.blkdev_requests.num_objs
> > 30779 ± 4% -34.7% 20084 ± 12% proc-vmstat.pgmigrate_success
> > 30779 ± 4% -34.7% 20084 ± 12% proc-vmstat.numa_pages_migrated
> > 447400 ± 2% -23.2% 343701 ± 16% numa-meminfo.node1.Slab
> > 2.532e+10 ± 0% -33.1% 1.694e+10 ± 1% cpuidle.C6-IVT.time
> > 3081 ± 9% +28.0% 3945 ± 12% slabinfo.mnt_cache.num_objs
> > 3026 ± 9% +28.8% 3898 ± 12% slabinfo.mnt_cache.active_objs
> > 5822 ± 4% +77.8% 10350 ± 25% numa-meminfo.node1.Writeback
> > 1454 ± 4% +77.3% 2579 ± 25% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_writeback
> > 424984 ± 1% -26.5% 312255 ± 3% proc-vmstat.numa_pte_updates
> > 368001 ± 1% -26.8% 269440 ± 3% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults
> > 456465 ± 1% -26.7% 334594 ± 4% time.minor_page_faults
> > 3.86 ± 3% -24.4% 2.92 ± 2% turbostat.CPU%c3
> > 4661151 ± 2% +20.6% 5622999 ± 9% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_free_pages
> > 18644452 ± 2% +20.6% 22491300 ± 9% numa-meminfo.node1.MemFree
> > 876 ± 2% +28.2% 1124 ± 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_objs
> > 858 ± 3% +24.0% 1064 ± 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_objs
> > 17767832 ± 8% -25.4% 13249545 ± 17% cpuidle.POLL.time
> > 285093 ± 1% -23.1% 219372 ± 5% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
> > 105423 ± 2% -16.1% 88498 ± 0% meminfo.Dirty
> > 26365 ± 1% -16.0% 22152 ± 1% proc-vmstat.nr_dirty
> > 41.04 ± 1% -14.1% 35.26 ± 1% turbostat.CPU%c1
> > 9385 ± 4% -14.3% 8043 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs
> > 9574 ± 3% -13.9% 8241 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs
> > 2411 ± 3% +17.0% 2820 ± 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.active_objs
> > 12595574 ± 0% -10.0% 11338368 ± 1% proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> > 5262 ± 1% +13.3% 5962 ± 1% slabinfo.kmalloc-1024.num_objs
> > 5262 ± 1% +12.7% 5932 ± 1% slabinfo.kmalloc-1024.active_objs
> > 2538 ± 3% +13.7% 2885 ± 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.num_objs
> > 5299546 ± 0% -9.9% 4776351 ± 0% slabinfo.buffer_head.active_objs
> > 5299546 ± 0% -9.9% 4776351 ± 0% slabinfo.buffer_head.num_objs
> > 135885 ± 0% -9.9% 122470 ± 0% slabinfo.buffer_head.num_slabs
> > 135885 ± 0% -9.9% 122470 ± 0% slabinfo.buffer_head.active_slabs
> > 28.04 ± 2% +715.6% 228.69 ± 3% iostat.sdb.avgrq-sz
> > 28.05 ± 2% +708.1% 226.72 ± 2% iostat.sdc.avgrq-sz
> > 2245 ± 3% -81.6% 413 ± 1% iostat.sda.w/s
> > 5.33 ± 1% +1008.2% 59.07 ± 1% iostat.sda.w_await
> > 5.85 ± 1% +1126.4% 71.69 ± 4% iostat.sda.r_await
> > 5.36 ± 1% +978.6% 57.79 ± 3% iostat.sdc.w_await
> > 1263 ± 4% -85.8% 179 ± 6% iostat.sdc.r/s
> > 2257 ± 3% -81.6% 414 ± 2% iostat.sdb.w/s
> > 1264 ± 4% -85.8% 179 ± 6% iostat.sdb.r/s
> > 5.55 ± 0% +1024.2% 62.37 ± 4% iostat.sdb.await
> > 5.89 ± 1% +1125.9% 72.16 ± 6% iostat.sdb.r_await
> > 5.36 ± 0% +1014.3% 59.75 ± 3% iostat.sdb.w_await
> > 5.57 ± 1% +987.9% 60.55 ± 3% iostat.sdc.await
> > 5.51 ± 0% +1017.3% 61.58 ± 1% iostat.sda.await
> > 1264 ± 4% -85.8% 179 ± 6% iostat.sda.r/s
> > 28.09 ± 2% +714.2% 228.73 ± 2% iostat.sda.avgrq-sz
> > 5.95 ± 2% +1091.0% 70.82 ± 6% iostat.sdc.r_await
> > 2252 ± 3% -81.5% 417 ± 2% iostat.sdc.w/s
> > 4032 ± 2% +151.6% 10143 ± 1% iostat.sdb.wrqm/s
> > 4043 ± 2% +151.0% 10150 ± 1% iostat.sda.wrqm/s
> > 4035 ± 2% +151.2% 10138 ± 1% iostat.sdc.wrqm/s
> > 26252 ± 1% -54.0% 12077 ± 4% vmstat.system.in
> > 37813 ± 0% +101.0% 75998 ± 1% vmstat.io.bo
> > 37789 ± 0% +101.0% 75945 ± 1% iostat.md0.wkB/s
> > 205 ± 0% +96.1% 402 ± 1% iostat.md0.w/s
> > 164286 ± 1% -46.2% 88345 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs
> > 27.07 ± 2% -46.7% 14.42 ± 3% turbostat.%Busy
> > 810 ± 2% -46.7% 431 ± 3% turbostat.Avg_MHz
> > 15.56 ± 2% +71.7% 26.71 ± 1% iostat.sda.avgqu-sz
> > 15.65 ± 2% +69.1% 26.46 ± 2% iostat.sdc.avgqu-sz
> > 15.67 ± 2% +72.7% 27.06 ± 2% iostat.sdb.avgqu-sz
> > 25151 ± 0% +68.3% 42328 ± 1% iostat.sda.wkB/s
> > 25153 ± 0% +68.2% 42305 ± 1% iostat.sdb.wkB/s
> > 25149 ± 0% +68.2% 42292 ± 1% iostat.sdc.wkB/s
> > 97.45 ± 0% -21.1% 76.90 ± 0% turbostat.CorWatt
> > 12517 ± 0% -20.2% 9994 ± 1% iostat.sdc.rkB/s
> > 12517 ± 0% -20.0% 10007 ± 1% iostat.sda.rkB/s
> > 12512 ± 0% -19.9% 10018 ± 1% iostat.sdb.rkB/s
> > 1863 ± 3% +24.7% 2325 ± 1% iostat.sdb.rrqm/s
> > 1865 ± 3% +24.3% 2319 ± 1% iostat.sdc.rrqm/s
> > 1864 ± 3% +24.6% 2322 ± 1% iostat.sda.rrqm/s
> > 128 ± 0% -16.4% 107 ± 0% turbostat.PkgWatt
> > 150569 ± 0% -8.7% 137525 ± 0% iostat.md0.avgqu-sz
> > 4.29 ± 0% -5.1% 4.07 ± 0% turbostat.RAMWatt
> >
> >
> > more detailed changes about ivb44/fsmark/1x-64t-4BRD_12G-RAID5-btrfs-4M-30G-NoSync
> > ---------
> >
> > 26089f4902595a2f 4400755e356f9a2b0b7ceaa02f
> > ---------------- --------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \
> > 273 ± 4% -18.1% 223 ± 6% fsmark.files_per_sec
> > 29.24 ± 1% +27.2% 37.20 ± 8% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
> > 29.24 ± 1% +27.2% 37.20 ± 8% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
> > 399 ± 4% -20.0% 319 ± 3% fsmark.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> > 129891 ± 20% -28.9% 92334 ± 15% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 266 ± 0% +413.4% 1365 ± 5% slabinfo.raid5-md0.num_objs
> > 266 ± 0% +413.4% 1365 ± 5% slabinfo.raid5-md0.active_objs
> > 0.23 ± 27% +98.6% 0.46 ± 35% turbostat.CPU%c3
> > 56612063 ± 9% +36.7% 77369763 ± 20% cpuidle.C1-IVT.time
> > 5579498 ± 14% -36.0% 3571516 ± 6% cpuidle.C1E-IVT.time
> > 4668 ± 38% +64.7% 7690 ± 19% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_unevictable
> > 18674 ± 38% +64.7% 30762 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node0.Unevictable
> > 9298 ± 37% +64.4% 15286 ± 19% proc-vmstat.nr_unevictable
> > 4629 ± 37% +64.1% 7596 ± 19% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_unevictable
> > 18535 ± 37% +63.9% 30385 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node1.Unevictable
> > 4270894 ± 19% +65.6% 7070923 ± 21% cpuidle.C3-IVT.time
> > 38457 ± 37% +59.0% 61148 ± 19% meminfo.Unevictable
> > 3748226 ± 17% +26.6% 4743674 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
> > 4495283 ± 13% -24.8% 3382315 ± 17% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_free_pages
> > 3818432 ± 16% +26.5% 4830938 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
> > 17966826 ± 13% -24.7% 13537228 ± 17% numa-meminfo.node0.MemFree
> > 14901309 ± 15% +29.7% 19330906 ± 12% numa-meminfo.node0.MemUsed
> > 26 ± 21% -32.9% 17 ± 14% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> > 1.183e+09 ± 1% +29.6% 1.533e+09 ± 8% cpuidle.C6-IVT.time
> > 29.24 ± 1% +27.2% 37.20 ± 8% time.elapsed_time
> > 29.24 ± 1% +27.2% 37.20 ± 8% time.elapsed_time.max
> > 399 ± 4% -20.0% 319 ± 3% time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> > 850 ± 4% -8.6% 777 ± 5% slabinfo.blkdev_requests.num_objs
> > 850 ± 4% -8.6% 777 ± 5% slabinfo.blkdev_requests.active_objs
> > 14986 ± 9% +17.1% 17548 ± 8% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_reclaimable
> > 11943 ± 5% -12.6% 10441 ± 2% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs
> > 59986 ± 9% +17.0% 70186 ± 8% numa-meminfo.node0.SReclaimable
> > 3703 ± 6% +10.2% 4082 ± 7% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_data_ref.num_objs
> > 133551 ± 6% +16.1% 154995 ± 1% proc-vmstat.pgfault
> > 129891 ± 20% -28.9% 92334 ± 15% time.voluntary_context_switches
> > 11823 ± 4% -12.0% 10409 ± 3% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs
> > 3703 ± 6% +9.7% 4061 ± 7% slabinfo.btrfs_delayed_data_ref.active_objs
> > 19761 ± 2% -11.2% 17542 ± 6% slabinfo.anon_vma.active_objs
> > 19761 ± 2% -11.2% 17544 ± 6% slabinfo.anon_vma.num_objs
> > 13002 ± 3% +14.9% 14944 ± 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_objs
> > 12695 ± 3% +13.8% 14446 ± 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
> > 1190 ± 1% -11.8% 1050 ± 3% slabinfo.mnt_cache.num_objs
> > 1190 ± 1% -11.8% 1050 ± 3% slabinfo.mnt_cache.active_objs
> > 136862 ± 1% -13.8% 117938 ± 7% cpuidle.C6-IVT.usage
> > 1692630 ± 3% +12.3% 1900854 ± 0% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written
> > 1056 ± 2% +8.8% 1149 ± 3% slabinfo.mm_struct.active_objs
> > 1056 ± 2% +8.8% 1149 ± 3% slabinfo.mm_struct.num_objs
> > 24029 ± 11% -30.6% 16673 ± 8% vmstat.system.cs
> > 8859 ± 2% -15.0% 7530 ± 8% vmstat.system.in
> > 905630 ± 2% -16.8% 753097 ± 4% iostat.md0.wkB/s
> > 906433 ± 2% -16.9% 753482 ± 4% vmstat.io.bo
> > 3591 ± 2% -16.9% 2982 ± 4% iostat.md0.w/s
> > 13.22 ± 5% -16.3% 11.07 ± 1% turbostat.%Busy
> > 402 ± 4% -15.9% 338 ± 1% turbostat.Avg_MHz
> > 54236 ± 3% +10.4% 59889 ± 4% iostat.md0.avgqu-sz
> > 7.67 ± 1% +4.5% 8.01 ± 1% turbostat.RAMWatt
> >
> >
> >
> > --yliu
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists