linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] add support for pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:51:33 +0200
From:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To:	Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>,
	"Gala, Kumar" <galak@...cinc.com>
Cc:	sdharia@...eaurora.org, mlocke@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	svarbanov@...sol.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	galak@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework


On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 11:37 -0600, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> pmic_arb v2 has no support for spmi non-data commands and thus
> returns -EOPNOTSUPP on .cmd callback. This causes a failure in
> spmi_drv_probe() which sends a wakeup command to the slave before
> probing its driver. This patchset removes the wakeup from
> spmi_drv_probe() since the spmi spec stipulates that a slaves
> default state is active and doesn't need a wakeup.
> 
> Changes from v3 to v4:
> * Remove the claim that this is a bug fix off the commit text
> * Unmap the core register space as soon as we know that it will not be used
> * Assign the core reg space to a local until we know if it appropriate to use
>    it to configure the controller fields (on v1) or unmap it (on v2).
> 
> Changes from v4 to v5:
> * remove the unmap added in v4 since it is used again and the mapping is managed.
> * correct printf formatting for 64bit compilers.
> * correct base address for reading the channel table.
> 
> Gilad Avidov (2):
>   spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe
>   spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2

Thank you Gilad. This is fine now. Tested on APQ8084
(controller v1) and MSM8916 (controller v2).

I am wandering which is the appropriate tree to merge this?

Kumar?

Tested-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@...sol.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/