linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: add a is_e820

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150326101923.GA29148@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:19:23 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, axboe@...nel.dk, boaz@...xistor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: add a is_e820_ram() helper

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:04:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah, the code is much clearer now:
> 
>   Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> 
> What tree is this intended for? Should I pick up the x86 bits?

The x86 bits really need to go through the x86 tree.  The pmem driver
itself would normally go through the block tree, but if Jens is fine with
it sending it through the x86 tree as well would allow us to have a single
complete tree for testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/