linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 10/11] sched: add SD_PREFER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:55:34 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
	kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@...hat.com, efault@....de,
	nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/11] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:54:13PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Add the SD_PREFER_SIBLING flag for SMT level in order to ensure that
> the scheduler will put at least 1 task per core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Preeti, what benchmarks did you use on power8 smt to verify performance?

I'm seeing a slight but statistically significant regression on my
ivb-ep kernel build when I match the build concurrency to my core count.

/me goes run (and install, its a fairly new box) more benches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/