[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326105534.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:55:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@...hat.com, efault@....de,
nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/11] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:54:13PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Add the SD_PREFER_SIBLING flag for SMT level in order to ensure that
> the scheduler will put at least 1 task per core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Preeti, what benchmarks did you use on power8 smt to verify performance?
I'm seeing a slight but statistically significant regression on my
ivb-ep kernel build when I match the build concurrency to my core count.
/me goes run (and install, its a fairly new box) more benches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists