linux-kernel - Re: [patch 03/12] mm: oom_kill: switch test-and-clear of known TIF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150326110532.GB18560@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:05:32 -0400
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/12] mm: oom_kill: switch test-and-clear of known
 TIF_MEMDIE to clear

Hi David,

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 08:31:49PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> 
> > exit_oom_victim() already knows that TIF_MEMDIE is set, and nobody
> > else can clear it concurrently.  Use clear_thread_flag() directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> 
> For the oom killer, that's true because of task_lock(): we always only set 
> TIF_MEMDIE when there is a valid p->mm and it's cleared in the exit path 
> after the unlock, acting as a barrier, when p->mm is set to NULL so it's 
> no longer a valid victim.  So that part is fine.
> 
> The problem is the android low memory killer that does 
> mark_tsk_oom_victim() without the protection of task_lock(), it's just rcu 
> protected so the reference to the task itself is guaranteed to still be 
> valid.

But this is about *setting* it without a lock.  My point was that once
TIF_MEMDIE is actually set, the task owns it and nobody else can clear
it for them, so it's safe to test and clear non-atomically from the
task's own context.  Am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/