linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: print cma-reserved pages from show

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150326134747.GN4701@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:47:47 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yalin Wang <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, vishnu.ps@...sung.com,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: print cma-reserved pages from show_mem

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:22:59PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:30:29PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:46:12AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > <SNIP>
> > > 
> > > Looking at Mel's commit, I don't see a reason why we couldn't use that
> > > solution - it gets rid of walking the page array, which has been fraught
> > > in the past due to ARM having platforms which have holes in their
> > > physical memory.
> > > 
> > > We could try that solution - I don't see much downside to it.  Most of
> > > that information is as debug information for MM stuff anyway, and IMHO
> > 
> > >From an MM perspective, I can tell you that the information is close to
> > useless for debugging anything. It's why I ditched it in that commit and
> > AFAIK, no one has ever cared.
> 
> In that case, is there much point to show_mem()?  Is it something which
> should be considered for removal?
> 
> If code serves no useful purpose anymore, we really ought to have a way

Sorry I was not clear. show_mem itself is useful, the shared and
non-shared values that commit c78e93630d15b5f5774213aad9bdc9f52473a89b
removed are not.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/