linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150326135144.GI5951@x1>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:51:44 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel@...inux.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain

On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Mar 2015, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> Quoting Lee Jones (2015-03-04 04:00:03)
> >> > Mike,
> >> >
> >> > Do you want me to resend this set with Robert's Reviewed-by applied,
> >> > or are you happy to apply it yourself?
> >>
> >> No need for the resend. I am hoping for a final review from a DT human.
> >>
> >> This approach looks fine to me. In practice I think it is restricted to
> >> hardware blocks that don't exist in DT yet (e.g. no driver, in the case
> >> of your interconnect) and that restriction is probably for the best.
> >
> > Agreed.
> 
> I think this restriction should be documented in the DT binding more clearly,
> as adding a "clk-always-on" node prohibits you from handling the clock
> correctly in
> the future.

Would you mind taking the time to explain what you think those
limitations are?

> Still, for simple devices where you don't have a driver, but have "predictable"
> bindings (e.g. a bus like "simple-pm-bus"), I think it's better to add
> a device node
> for that simple device now, incl. a reference to the clock, and have a simple
> driver that binds to the device, or platform code that looks for a
> compatible node,
> and enables the clock. That way you don't have to make any chances to the DTS
> later, when you'll have a real driver.
> 
> >> > > v2 => v3:
> >> > >   - Ensure DT actually reflects h/w
> >> > >     - i.e. Nodes should not contain a mishmash of different IP
> >> > >       blocks, but should identify related h/w.  In the current
> >> > >       example we use interconnects
> >> > >   - Change naming from clkdomain to clk-always-on
> >> > >   - Place "do not abuse" warning in documentation
> >> > >
> >> > > v1 => v2:
> >> > >   - Turned the ST specific driver into a generic one
> >> > >
> >> > > Hardware can have a bunch of clocks which must not be turned off.
> >> > > If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any of these or b) give
> >> > > up a previously obtained reference during suspend, the common clk
> >> > > framework will attempt to turn them off and the hardware will
> >> > > subsequently die.  The only way to recover from this failure is to
> >> > > restart.
> >> > >
> >> > > To avoid either of these two scenarios from catastrophically
> >> > > disabling the running system we have implemented a clock domain
> >> > > where clocks are consumed and references are taken, thus preventing
> >> > > them from being shut down by the framework.
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/