linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IIO: Adds ACPI support for ST gyroscopes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150326140430.GM1878@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:04:30 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@...il.com>,
	Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@...el.com>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IIO: Adds ACPI support for ST gyroscopes

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:04:35PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:12:16PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >> >> I think we can do the same for ACPI GpioInts so that we introduce
> >> >> acpi_gpio_irq_get() that translates from GpioInt to Linux IRQ
> >> >> numberspace. Then we can do something like below in I2C core:
> >> >>
> >> >>       if (client->irq <= 0) {
> >> >>               int irq = -ENOENT;
> >> >>
> >> >>                 if (dev->of_node)
> >> >>                         irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> >> >>                 else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
> >> >>                         irq = acpi_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);
> >> >>
> >> >>               if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> >>                         return irq;
> >> >>                 if (irq < 0)
> >> >>                         irq = 0;
> >> >>
> >> >>                 client->irq = irq;
> >> >>       }
> >> >>
> >> >> Now it has the drawback that the first GpioInt will not be available to
> >> >> the driver anymore (as a GPIO since it is locked) but if DT already does
> >> >> the same we should be fine.
> >> >
> >> > Below patch should take care of this.
> >> >
> >>
> >> One issue we noticed is that now the gpio request and set input
> >> directions operations are not called anymore. Some gpio controller
> >> drivers (dln2, adnp, lynx_point from quickly browsing the code) do not
> >> explicitly enable the GPIO pin nor set direction to input when the
> >> interrupt is enabled. Depending on hardware this may be an issue - it
> >> is on dln2 for example.
> >>
> >> Should the gpio controllers enable and set to input in irq_enable,
> >> irq_bus_sync_unlock, etc.? Or should this be done in gpiolib?
> >
> > Good question.
> >
> > In general I think that it is assumed that the boot firmware configures
> > the pin upfront. However, we have seen too many times that it actually
> > doesn't happen or it is configured wrong.
> >
> > Perhaps we could do this in GPIO core, for example in
> > gpiochip_irq_reqres/gpiochip_irq_map or so.
> >
> 
> That sounds good to me. We tested your patch with the patch below and
> we can now directly use client->irq:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 568aa2b..9865627 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -511,6 +511,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gpiochip_domain_ops = {
>  static int gpiochip_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>         struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = gpiod_request(&chip->desc[d->hwirq], "IRQ");
> +       if (ret) {
> +               chip_err(chip, "unable to request %lu for IRQ\n", d->hwirq);
> +               return ret;
> +       }

What if the driver has already requested the GPIO?

> +
> +       ret = gpiod_direction_input(&chip->desc[d->hwirq]);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               chip_err(chip, "unable to set HW IRQ %lu as input\n", d->hwirq);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> 
>         if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(chip, d->hwirq)) {
>                 chip_err(chip,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/