lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326141128.GL15257@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:11:28 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/12] mm: page_alloc: inline should_alloc_retry()

On Wed 25-03-15 02:17:11, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The should_alloc_retry() function was meant to encapsulate retry
> conditions of the allocator slowpath, but there are still checks
> remaining in the main function, and much of how the retrying is
> performed also depends on the OOM killer progress.  The physical
> separation of those conditions make the code hard to follow.
> 
> Inline the should_alloc_retry() checks.  Notes:
> 
> - The __GFP_NOFAIL check is already done in __alloc_pages_may_oom(),
>   replace it with looping on OOM killer progress
> 
> - The pm_suspended_storage() check is meant to skip the OOM killer
>   when reclaim has no IO available, move to __alloc_pages_may_oom()
> 
> - The order < PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY order is re-united with its original
>   counterpart of checking whether reclaim actually made any progress

it should be order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY
 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

The resulting code looks much better and logical.

After the COSTLY check is fixed.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 9ebc760187ac..c1224ba45548 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2329,48 +2329,6 @@ void warn_alloc_failed(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, const char *fmt, ...)
>  		show_mem(filter);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int
> -should_alloc_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> -				unsigned long did_some_progress,
> -				unsigned long pages_reclaimed)
> -{
> -	/* Do not loop if specifically requested */
> -	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	/* Always retry if specifically requested */
> -	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Suspend converts GFP_KERNEL to __GFP_WAIT which can prevent reclaim
> -	 * making forward progress without invoking OOM. Suspend also disables
> -	 * storage devices so kswapd will not help. Bail if we are suspending.
> -	 */
> -	if (!did_some_progress && pm_suspended_storage())
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * In this implementation, order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> -	 * means __GFP_NOFAIL, but that may not be true in other
> -	 * implementations.
> -	 */
> -	if (order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * For order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, if __GFP_REPEAT is
> -	 * specified, then we retry until we no longer reclaim any pages
> -	 * (above), or we've reclaimed an order of pages at least as
> -	 * large as the allocation's order. In both cases, if the
> -	 * allocation still fails, we stop retrying.
> -	 */
> -	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT && pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static inline struct page *
>  __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	const struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned long *did_some_progress)
> @@ -2409,16 +2367,18 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		/* The OOM killer does not needlessly kill tasks for lowmem */
>  		if (ac->high_zoneidx < ZONE_NORMAL)
>  			goto out;
> -		/* The OOM killer does not compensate for light reclaim */
> +		/* The OOM killer does not compensate for IO-less reclaim */
>  		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * XXX: Page reclaim didn't yield anything,
>  			 * and the OOM killer can't be invoked, but
> -			 * keep looping as per should_alloc_retry().
> +			 * keep looping as per tradition.
>  			 */
>  			*did_some_progress = 1;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> +		if (pm_suspended_storage())
> +			goto out;
>  		/* The OOM killer may not free memory on a specific node */
>  		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)
>  			goto out;
> @@ -2801,40 +2761,40 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_pg;
>  
> -	/* Check if we should retry the allocation */
> +	/* Do not loop if specifically requested */
> +	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> +		goto noretry;
> +
> +	/* Keep reclaiming pages as long as there is reasonable progress */
>  	pages_reclaimed += did_some_progress;
> -	if (should_alloc_retry(gfp_mask, order, did_some_progress,
> -						pages_reclaimed)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If we fail to make progress by freeing individual
> -		 * pages, but the allocation wants us to keep going,
> -		 * start OOM killing tasks.
> -		 */
> -		if (!did_some_progress) {
> -			page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac,
> -							&did_some_progress);
> -			if (page)
> -				goto got_pg;
> -			if (!did_some_progress)
> -				goto nopage;
> -		}
> +	if ((did_some_progress && order < PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) ||
> +	    ((gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) && pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))) {
>  		/* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
>  		wait_iff_congested(ac->preferred_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
>  		goto retry;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * High-order allocations do not necessarily loop after
> -		 * direct reclaim and reclaim/compaction depends on compaction
> -		 * being called after reclaim so call directly if necessary
> -		 */
> -		page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order,
> -					alloc_flags, ac, migration_mode,
> -					&contended_compaction,
> -					&deferred_compaction);
> -		if (page)
> -			goto got_pg;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Reclaim has failed us, start killing things */
> +	page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac, &did_some_progress);
> +	if (page)
> +		goto got_pg;
> +
> +	/* Retry as long as the OOM killer is making progress */
> +	if (did_some_progress)
> +		goto retry;
> +
> +noretry:
> +	/*
> +	 * High-order allocations do not necessarily loop after
> +	 * direct reclaim and reclaim/compaction depends on compaction
> +	 * being called after reclaim so call directly if necessary
> +	 */
> +	page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags,
> +					    ac, migration_mode,
> +					    &contended_compaction,
> +					    &deferred_compaction);
> +	if (page)
> +		goto got_pg;
>  nopage:
>  	warn_alloc_failed(gfp_mask, order, NULL);
>  got_pg:
> -- 
> 2.3.3
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ