[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150325172109.GJ14585@localhost>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:21:09 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch v11 13/23] ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for
CPU hardware ID
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor,
> but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to
> some inconsistence for the drivers.
>
> Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU
> ids a generic CPU physical id type is required.
>
> So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce
> a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined
> by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver,
> and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID
> in the following patch.
>
> CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> [hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes]
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
BTW, am I still the author of this patch? If yes, it's missing a From:
line.
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> acpi_status status;
> int ret;
>
> - if (pr->phys_id == -1)
> + if (pr->phys_id == PHYS_CPUID_INVALID)
> return -ENODEV;
If PHYS_CPUID_INVALID is the same as INVALID_HWID, we should get rid of
the latter in the arm64 code (as a subsequent clean-up patch).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists