[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:31:07 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if
acpi=force is passed
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:56PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
> param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
> in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
> acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
> unflattened.
>
> CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
but as I said, we should take Lorenzo's patch on top as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists