[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326155248.GW4441@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:52:49 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org >> SCSI development list"
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: SCSI aic7xxx driver and AMD IOMMU
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:58:15AM -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> Sorry but CMA was still badly broken. I have a patch below that works.
In which way is it broken? What happens when you try to allocate memory
with dma_alloc_coherent?
> I've tested it with small (no CMA) and large (with CMA) dma's using
> dma_alloc_coherent. The patch below is just the "git diff" from your
> cloned tree piped to a file then copied into this email. If you require
> an official patch I can send one. Just let me know.
The main differences I can spot are that you change the order (first
CMA, then buddy) and you manually align the input size. I can see the
reason for the later, but why does CMA need to be tried first?
> Also, in my opinion, this CMA thing is clearly a BUG not a feature
> request. The AMD iommu clearly breaks CMA. I feel what ever fix
> you are happy with should be back ported to stable.
It is not a BUG, the interface definition for dma_alloc_coherent does
not specify that it can allocate infinite amounts of memory. So this
patch does not qualify for stable.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists