[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1427389400.2777.3.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:03:20 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pjt@...gle.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, efault@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, jason.low2@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] sched: Improve load balancing in the presence of
idle CPUs
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:32 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index bcfe320..8b6d0d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7660,14 +7660,16 @@ static void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
> enum cpu_idle_type idle = this_rq->idle_balance ?
> CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE;
>
> - rebalance_domains(this_rq, idle);
> -
> /*
> * If this cpu has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the
> * balancing on behalf of the other idle cpus whose ticks are
> - * stopped.
> + * stopped. Do nohz_idle_balance *before* rebalance_domains to
> + * give the idle cpus a chance to load balance. Else we may
> + * load balance only within the local sched_domain hierarchy
> + * and abort nohz_idle_balance altogether if we pull some load.
> */
> nohz_idle_balance(this_rq, idle);
> + rebalance_domains(this_rq, idle);
Reviewed-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists