[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326185537.GM9742@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:55:37 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] thermal: Fix not emulating critical temperatures
+Cc Amit who implemented the emulation code.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:13:47PM -0400, Carlos Hernandez wrote:
> On 03/26/2015 11:53 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >- The code should only accept an emulated temperature when the emulated
> > temperature is lower than the critical temperature. Instead the code
>
> Why?
> Emulating temperatures higher than critical temperature is useful
> for testing. For instance it allows one to validate that critical
> action (i.e. shutdown) is triggered.
Not emulating critical temperatures was the intention of the original
patch adding the emulation code, but it was implemented wrongly. I just
fix to the intended behaviour.
However, I also find emulating critical temperatures useful. I could
also remove the check instead of fixing it if we can agree on that
behaviour.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists