[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326211334.GA3359@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:13:34 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Tatyana Nikolova <Tatyana.E.Nikolova@...el.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Alex Estrin <alex.estrin@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Tom Tucker <tom@....us>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND] IB/Verbs: Use helpers to refine the checking
on transport and link layer
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:58:20PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
> The questions is just wondering how the transition method could be, but
> if we have to do the changes for vendor, that sounds like a tough job...
I would see changing how the information is represented in the struct
as a follow on issue. The first patch should go through and replace
all direct access to the link layer/transport/etc with an
appropriately narrow is_XX() test like Doug was suggesting.
That means looking at each code site and determining what it needs,
making a is_XX for it and a kdoc describing exactly what is needed for
the test to return true.
The follow on patch can then rework the is_XX and drop the link
layer/transport stuff..
Some ideas for is_XX:
IB compatible SA
QP0 SMP mechanism
IB SMP format
OPA SMP format
QP1 GMP mechanism
IB compatible CM
GID addressing
IP/IPv6 addressing
Ethernet VLAN
...
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists