[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871tkbxwup.fsf@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:38:54 +0100
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
>> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
>
> drivers/platform/arm ?
Most certainly.
I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for
drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take
the review/merge burden ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists