lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150327183035.29e1bcec@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:30:35 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the s390
 tree

Hi Jiri,

Today's linux-next merge of the livepatching tree got a conflict in
arch/s390/Kconfig between commit 5a79859ae0f3 ("s390: remove 31 bit
support") from the s390 tree and commit b8887ad66c1c ("livepatch: add
support on s390") from the livepatching tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/s390/Kconfig
index 1de26e1c48ac,eba9c1d0dab5..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@@ -132,7 -132,8 +132,8 @@@ config S39
  	select HAVE_KERNEL_XZ
  	select HAVE_KPROBES
  	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
 -	select HAVE_KVM if 64BIT
 +	select HAVE_KVM
+ 	select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
  	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
  	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
  	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ