[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5514AF61.2050909@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:16:17 +0800
From: yakir <ykk@...k-chips.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, djkurtz@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Brian Austin <brian.austin@...rus.com>,
Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, Sean Cross <xobs@...agi.com>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, mmind00@...glemail.com,
marcheu@...omium.org, mark.yao@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] ASoC: rockchip/rockchip-hdmi-audio: add sound
driver for hdmi audio
Hi Mark,
On 2015年03月27日 02:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:04:30PM -0500, Yakir Yang wrote:
>
>> + ret = snd_soc_dai_set_fmt(cpu_dai, dai_fmt);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(cpu_dai->dev, "failed to set cpu_dai fmt.\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
> You've already set this in the dai_link, no need to do it again.
Okay, correct it in next v5.
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "hdmi audio init success.\n");
> Please remove noisy prints like this.
Okay, turn it to dev_debug(...)
>> +free_cpu_of_node:
>> + hdmi_audio_dai.cpu_of_node = NULL;
>> + hdmi_audio_dai.platform_of_node = NULL;
>> +free_priv_data:
>> + snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(card, NULL);
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> + card->dev = NULL;
> If any of these assignments is doing anything there's a problem with the
> code.
>
Yes, when probe failed, program will goto this code.
>> +{
>> + struct snd_soc_card *card = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + snd_soc_unregister_card(card);
> devm_snd_soc_register_card() and you can remove this function entirely.
do you mean that when I take devm_snd_soc_register_card() to register card,
then I do not need unregister card any more(destroy with device) ?
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_hdmi_audio_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-hdmi-audio", },
>> + {},
>> +};
> There is no documentation for this binding, binding documentation is
> mandatory. Based on the compatible string this looks like it's specific
> to the SoC rather than a design for a board - is the whole card part of
> the SoC?
It's my fault, cause the dts patch have not CC you, I will correct it in
next v5
Thanks :)
Yakir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists