[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1427442750-8112-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:52:30 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix update the nohz.next_balance even if we haven't done any load balance
As Srikar pointed out (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/26):
| With the current code when the ilb cpus are not free:
| - We would be updating the nohz.next_balance even through we havent done
| any load balance.
| - We might iterate thro the nohz.idle_cpus_mask()s to find balance_cpus.
This patch fix it by adding need_resched check with the idle check, and
keep the need_resched check in for loop to catch ilb get busy.
Suggested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0576ce0..788e42f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7638,7 +7638,7 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
struct rq *rq;
int balance_cpu;
- if (idle != CPU_IDLE ||
+ if (idle != CPU_IDLE || need_resched() ||
!test_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(this_cpu)))
goto end;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists