[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK5ve-+vwbMhDc-_YE3skwSS0RtCULspzQiYyPwero6a_jFk7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 18:20:02 -0700
From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To: minyard@....org
Cc: Raphael Assenat <raph@...com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-gpio: Fix error handling and memory leak
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:43 PM, <minyard@....org> wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
>
> The leds-gpio driver would not clean up properly if it failed in some
> places, and it wasn't freeing its private data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> index d26af0a..32f7642 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
> @@ -198,8 +198,10 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev)
> } else {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !led.name && np)
> led.name = np->name;
> - if (!led.name)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + if (!led.name) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> }
> fwnode_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger",
> &led.default_trigger);
> @@ -217,19 +219,21 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (fwnode_property_present(child, "retain-state-suspended"))
> led.retain_state_suspended = 1;
>
> - ret = create_gpio_led(&led, &priv->leds[priv->num_leds++],
> + ret = create_gpio_led(&led, &priv->leds[priv->num_leds],
Why need this change? it's correct. And your add one more line
"priv->num_leds++"
> dev, NULL);
> if (ret < 0) {
> fwnode_handle_put(child);
> goto err;
> }
> + priv->num_leds++;
Why need this?
> }
>
> return priv;
>
> err:
> - for (count = priv->num_leds - 2; count >= 0; count--)
> + for (count = priv->num_leds - 1; count >= 0; count--)
> delete_gpio_led(&priv->leds[count]);
> + devm_kfree(dev, priv);
priv is created by devm_kzalloc(), so if driver probing return error,
it will be freed automatically, you don't need call devm_free();
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> @@ -283,6 +287,7 @@ static int gpio_led_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> for (i = 0; i < priv->num_leds; i++)
> delete_gpio_led(&priv->leds[i]);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, priv);
No need this during remove.
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists