lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 04:42:56 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Vincent Guittot <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched:
  Move CFS tasks to CPUs with higher capacity

Commit-ID:  1aaf90a4b88aae26a4535ba01dacab520a310d17
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/1aaf90a4b88aae26a4535ba01dacab520a310d17
Author:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:54:14 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:36:06 +0100

sched: Move CFS tasks to CPUs with higher capacity

When a CPU is used to handle a lot of IRQs or some RT tasks, the remaining
capacity for CFS tasks can be significantly reduced. Once we detect such
situation by comparing cpu_capacity_orig and cpu_capacity, we trig an idle
load balance to check if it's worth moving its tasks on an idle CPU.

It's worth trying to move the task before the CPU is fully utilized to
minimize the preemption by irq or RT tasks.

Once the idle load_balance has selected the busiest CPU, it will look for an
active load balance for only two cases:

  - There is only 1 task on the busiest CPU.

  - We haven't been able to move a task of the busiest rq.

A CPU with a reduced capacity is included in the 1st case, and it's worth to
actively migrate its task if the idle CPU has got more available capacity for
CFS tasks. This test has been added in need_active_balance.

As a sidenote, this will not generate more spurious ilb because we already
trig an ilb if there is more than 1 busy cpu. If this cpu is the only one that
has a task, we will trig the ilb once for migrating the task.

The nohz_kick_needed function has been cleaned up a bit while adding the new
test

env.src_cpu and env.src_rq must be set unconditionnally because they are used
in need_active_balance which is called even if busiest->nr_running equals 1

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@....com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com
Cc: efault@....de
Cc: kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: nicolas.pitre@...aro.org
Cc: preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: riel@...hat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425052454-25797-12-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d36f8d2..0576ce0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6855,6 +6855,19 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The dst_cpu is idle and the src_cpu CPU has only 1 CFS task.
+	 * It's worth migrating the task if the src_cpu's capacity is reduced
+	 * because of other sched_class or IRQs if more capacity stays
+	 * available on dst_cpu.
+	 */
+	if ((env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE) &&
+	    (env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_running == 1)) {
+		if ((check_cpu_capacity(env->src_rq, sd)) &&
+		    (capacity_of(env->src_cpu)*sd->imbalance_pct < capacity_of(env->dst_cpu)*100))
+			return 1;
+	}
+
 	return unlikely(sd->nr_balance_failed > sd->cache_nice_tries+2);
 }
 
@@ -6954,6 +6967,9 @@ redo:
 
 	schedstat_add(sd, lb_imbalance[idle], env.imbalance);
 
+	env.src_cpu = busiest->cpu;
+	env.src_rq = busiest;
+
 	ld_moved = 0;
 	if (busiest->nr_running > 1) {
 		/*
@@ -6963,8 +6979,6 @@ redo:
 		 * correctly treated as an imbalance.
 		 */
 		env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
-		env.src_cpu   = busiest->cpu;
-		env.src_rq    = busiest;
 		env.loop_max  = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
 
 more_balance:
@@ -7664,22 +7678,25 @@ end:
 
 /*
  * Current heuristic for kicking the idle load balancer in the presence
- * of an idle cpu is the system.
+ * of an idle cpu in the system.
  *   - This rq has more than one task.
- *   - At any scheduler domain level, this cpu's scheduler group has multiple
- *     busy cpu's exceeding the group's capacity.
+ *   - This rq has at least one CFS task and the capacity of the CPU is
+ *     significantly reduced because of RT tasks or IRQs.
+ *   - At parent of LLC scheduler domain level, this cpu's scheduler group has
+ *     multiple busy cpu.
  *   - For SD_ASYM_PACKING, if the lower numbered cpu's in the scheduler
  *     domain span are idle.
  */
-static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
+static inline bool nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
 	struct sched_group_capacity *sgc;
 	int nr_busy, cpu = rq->cpu;
+	bool kick = false;
 
 	if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
        /*
 	* We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
@@ -7693,38 +7710,46 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
 	 * balancing.
 	 */
 	if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	if (time_before(now, nohz.next_balance))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 
 	if (rq->nr_running >= 2)
-		goto need_kick;
+		return true;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu));
-
 	if (sd) {
 		sgc = sd->groups->sgc;
 		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgc->nr_busy_cpus);
 
-		if (nr_busy > 1)
-			goto need_kick_unlock;
+		if (nr_busy > 1) {
+			kick = true;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+
 	}
 
-	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu));
+	sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
+	if (sd) {
+		if ((rq->cfs.h_nr_running >= 1) &&
+				check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)) {
+			kick = true;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+	}
 
+	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu));
 	if (sd && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
-				  sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
-		goto need_kick_unlock;
-
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return 0;
+				  sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu)) {
+		kick = true;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 
-need_kick_unlock:
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-need_kick:
-	return 1;
+	return kick;
 }
 #else
 static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) { }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ