linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dmaengine: of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:25:29 +0200
From:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers

On 03/26/2015 05:32 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> I have added the DT binding document since this series adds support for
>> routers for platforms booting with DT:
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt | 28 ++++++++
> I meant the update to Documnetation/dmanegine/ for routers :)

I see. In what form you think we should have the documentation? Is it adequate
to lift and adjust the text from the DT binding document here? Should we have
a separate file for the router description?
My concern was and this is why I did not wrote anything under here is that the
code I add is only covers the DT boot case and I'm not planning to add legacy
support. The ACPI binding can be done in a similar fashion as the DT so you
would have a translator driver with ACPI API.

-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/