[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1503271501210.6781@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:09:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
sjenning@...hat.com, vojtech@...e.cz,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] livepatch: add support on s390
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Fair enough; I merged it because I was convinced that we have your Ack for
> > the very same patch in our tree for kGraft, but now that I look again, we
> > apparently don't. So sorry for that. What is your standpoint on this one
> > then, please?
>
> I thought there was more available then the simple testcase within the kernel.
For kGraft we have, and I believe kPatch guys also have patches they are
distributing for their own distro.
So far we have the simplest testcases working with the in-kernel common
infrastructure, and are working on adding more features (called
"consistency models" in some discussions) that will allow for more
complexity in the patches, so that we ultimately reach (or overcome) the
level of complexity we are currently able to handle in kgraft/kpatch.
> But since the testcase works:
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Thanks a lot, Heiko.
As I am generally never rebasing a published branches, I've split the
'for-4.1/core' to two branches and applied the patch ammended with your
Ack to 'for-4.1/core-s390'.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists