[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150327093942.8ad38cd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:39:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@...net.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache
only)
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:30:46 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> I expect that this situation (first part in cache, latter part not in
> cache) is rare - for reasonably small requests the common cases will be
> "all cached" and "nothing cached". So perhaps the best approach here
> is for samba to add special handling for the short read, to work out
> the reason for its occurrence.
>
> Alternatively we could add another flag to pread2() to select this
> "throw away my data and return -EAGAIN" behaviour. Presumably
> implemented with an i_size check, but it's gonna be racy.
Here's a better way:
nr_read = pread2(buf, len);
if (nr_read < len)
nr_read += pread(buf + nr_read, len - nr_read);
if (nr_read < len)
we_hit_eof();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists