[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iodnqfp1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:01:22 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Hajime Tazaki <tazaki@...e.ad.jp>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, corbet@....net,
cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jdike@...toit.com,
mathieu.lacage@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> writes:
> This also infers that arch/lib will be broken most of the time as
> every time the networking stack references a new symbol it
> has to be duplicated into arch/lib.
>
> But this does not mean that your idea is bad, all I want to say that
> I'm not sure whether arch/lib is the right approach.
> Maybe Arnd has a better idea.
Exactly why I look forward to getting this in-tree. Jeremy Kerr and I
wrote nfsim back in 2005(!) which stubbed around the netfilter
infrastructure; with failtest and valgrind it found some nasty bugs. It
was too much hassle to maintain out-of-tree though :(
I look forward to a flood of great bugfixes from this work :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists