| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150327164405.GA5758@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:44:05 +0100 From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> To: nick <xerofoify@...il.com> Cc: clm@...com, jbacik@...com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to do Header Dependency Check Properly for Kernel Patch On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:45:07PM -0400, nick wrote: > I have a patch for moving over the rcu-string header file for btrfs to > the standard include headers in include/linux > as you stated this on a to do on the brtfs to do page for the > project's wiki page. The wiki page states that the task is already assigned https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Move_rcu_string_out_of_btrfs_to_lib.2F besides that there were 8 iterations of the patchset, acked by the respective people. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1862689 > index de5e4f2..df8e981 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ > * Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, > * Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA. > */ > +#pragma once > > #ifndef __BTRFS_I__ > #define __BTRFS_I__ the pragmas are not used in kernel AFAIK, the ifndef right below the line serves the exact purpose. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists