[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150327165739.GJ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:57:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/timer] perf: Add per event clockid support
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:52:25AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Ok, I see. But on architectures which do not have NMI, they would all
> be safe. And that would work if they set the PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_NMI flag
> on their pmu->capabilities.
Indeed so. I have not audited them all as the current 'default' is safe.
> Next, I am trying to understand how perf is going to expose this. I am
> thinking about this in the context of my jitted code patches.
I send you some preliminary patches for this.
> With this approach, the jit runtime and the perf tool need to agree on
> the clock they are using. That mean they need to advertise or document
> the clock they use
This is indeed still missing, I put an XXX question in one of the
emails to this effect. I suppose we should store the used clockid in the
data file. I just haven't figured out how all that code works.
> and there needs to be an option in perf record to pass that same
> clockid.
I did indeed post a patch to do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists