[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150327193813.GH5622@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:38:13 +0100
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@....fi>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
jgross@...e.com, JBeulich@...e.com, bp@...e.de,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
airlied@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/47] vidoe: fbdev: atyfb: remove and fix MTRR MMIO
"hole" work around
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:59PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> > index 8025624..8875e56 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> > @@ -2630,21 +2630,10 @@ static int aty_init(struct fb_info *info)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MTRR
> > par->mtrr_aper = -1;
> > - par->mtrr_reg = -1;
> > if (!nomtrr) {
> > - /* Cover the whole resource. */
> > - par->mtrr_aper = mtrr_add(par->res_start, par->res_size,
> > + par->mtrr_aper = mtrr_add(info->fix.smem_start,
> > + info->fix.smem_len,
> > MTRR_TYPE_WRCOMB, 1);
>
> MTRRs need power of two size, so how is this supposed to work?
As per mtrr_add_page() [0] the base and size are just supposed to be in units
of 4 KiB, although the practice is to use powers of 2 in *some* drivers this
is not standardized and by no means recorded as a requirement. Obviously
powers of 2 will work too and you'd end up neatly aligned as well. mtrr_add()
will use mtrr_check() to verify the the same requirement. Furthermore,
as per my commit log message:
---
The last thing we do must do to remain sane is ensure we
use the info->fix.smem_start and info->fix.smem_len for
the framebuffer MTRR as we know that is always well adjusted.
The *one* concern here would be if the MTRR is not in units
of 4K __but__ we already know that in the PCI case this cannot
happen, in the shared space setting the MTRR would be up to
0x7ff000 and assuming a 4K page:
; 0x7ff000 / 0x1000
2047
Also, internally when MTRR is used mtrr_add() will use mtrr_check()
and that should splat a warning when the MTRR base and size are
not compatible with what is expected for MTRR usage.
---
If any of this is too risky we can use the __arch_phys_wc_add() (or as
Andy suggested perhaps use set_page_* stuff, although I am still evaluating
this) but I did this change to show the effort required for a change when
the registers / framebuffer is on the same PCI BAR but at different offsets.
[0] scripts/kernel-doc -man -function mtrr_add_page arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c | nroff -man | less
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists