[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5515BAF7.6070604@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:17:59 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: anton@...bar.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: do not throttle based on pfmemalloc reserves
if node has no reclaimable zones
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>
> for (i = 0; i <= ZONE_NORMAL; i++) {
> zone = &pgdat->node_zones[i];
> - if (!populated_zone(zone))
> + if (!populated_zone(zone) || !zone_reclaimable(zone))
> continue;
>
> pfmemalloc_reserve += min_wmark_pages(zone);
Do you really want zone_reclaimable()? Or do you want something more
direct like "zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) == 0"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists