[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150327202446.GB4027@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:24:46 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, tony@...mide.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Take DMA request number from
DT if it is available
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node || of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "dma-requests",
> + &od->dma_requests)) {
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> + "Missing dma-requests property, using %u.\n",
> + OMAP_SDMA_REQUESTS);
> + od->dma_requests = OMAP_SDMA_REQUESTS;
> + }
Are all OMAPs including OMAP1 being converted to DT? If not, don't
introduce noisy printks for which a platform can't do anything about.
Think about this please - if there's no of_node, then why complain
about a missing OF property?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists